overharrowed: (I know he's sick but we can't be sure)
Julius ([personal profile] overharrowed) wrote 2018-11-06 01:07 am (UTC)

[A pause, not as if he's shocked, but if he's selecting his words. (Or, perhaps, double-checking that the message is private.)]

I think that, as long as the crisis remains acute, they are not willing to do without mages, or even the majority of mages. In that, the strike achieved one aim. It proved that they were not willing to discard the resource, even with less than perfect docile passivity.

How far they can be pushed, or wisely should be, is a different question.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting